pump.fun vs FOMO
verdict · by 30d fees
pump.fun is currently the bigger platform (roughly 3× by 30-day fees). Size is not the whole story: chains, fee routing and creator rewards differ meaningfully. Numbers refresh hourly from DefiLlama.
platform facts
| Fact | pump.fun | FOMO |
|---|---|---|
| Chains | Solana | Solana |
| Live since | 2024 | 2025 |
| Launch cost | Free (network fees only, well under $1) | Free in-app (network fees only) |
| Trading fees | ~1% trading fee on bonding-curve trades; post-graduation swaps are charged on PumpSwap, with a share routed to the token creator. | Trading fees are charged in-app per swap; referral sign-ups reduce effective fees via rewards. |
| Graduation | Bonding curve fills → automatic migration to PumpSwap | In-app curve → open market trading |
| Creator rewards | Creator fee-sharing on graduated tokens (introduced 2025), paid from PumpSwap trading fees. | Social/referral reward programs inside the app. |
pump.fun in short
The platform that invented the bonding-curve memecoin launch and still leads the category on volume and revenue. FOMO wraps the same launch mechanic in a mobile social-trading app. Our comparison pages put live numbers side by side: see pump.fun vs LetsBONK, pump.fun vs FOMO and pump.fun vs Bags.
→ full pump.fun stats→ pump.fun reviewFOMO in short
Mobile-first social trading app whose built-in launchpad turned it into pump.fun's fastest-growing challenger in 2026. FOMO launched in 2025 and grew quickly through 2026 into one of pump.fun's more visible challengers. When you compare FOMO against pump.fun or LetsBONK on this site, keep in mind that FOMO's totals include copy-trading and general swaps that have nothing to do with a new token launch. FOMO's closest comparison on mechanics is pump.fun, whose bonding-curve model it wraps inside a mobile app.
→ full FOMO stats→ FOMO reviewData comes from DefiLlama, refreshed hourly. MemeFees is independent and not affiliated with pump.fun or FOMO. Nothing here is financial advice.